2 CFR contract provisions

HN
Houston, Norma
Tue, Apr 21, 2020 5:33 PM

Listmates:

As you all are no doubt painfully aware, contracts under which costs are incurred for which an applicant seeks FEMA PA reimbursement are subject to 2 CFR Part 200 (Uniform Guidance) procurement requirements.  Among these requirements are that a number of federally-required contract provisions must be included in the contracts.  Even under the current E/E guidance issued by FEMA for the COVID-19 event, the federal contract provision requirement is still in effect.  Have any of your states enacted legislation (or perhaps for those with broad local ordinance authority, an ordinance) incorporating these contracts provisions by reference by operation of law where required and applicable under federal law?

[http://www.sog.unc.edu/dailybulletin/images/SOGLogoForEmail.gif]Norma R. Houston
Lecturer in Public Law and Government
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Campus Box 3330, Knapp-Sanders Building
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3330
T: 919.843.8930
www.sog.unc.eduhttp://www.sog.unc.edu/

E-mails sent to or from this e-mail address that relate to the School of Government's work are public records and may be subject to public access under the North Carolina public records law.

Listmates: As you all are no doubt painfully aware, contracts under which costs are incurred for which an applicant seeks FEMA PA reimbursement are subject to 2 CFR Part 200 (Uniform Guidance) procurement requirements. Among these requirements are that a number of federally-required contract provisions must be included in the contracts. Even under the current E/E guidance issued by FEMA for the COVID-19 event, the federal contract provision requirement is still in effect. Have any of your states enacted legislation (or perhaps for those with broad local ordinance authority, an ordinance) incorporating these contracts provisions by reference by operation of law where required and applicable under federal law? [http://www.sog.unc.edu/dailybulletin/images/SOGLogoForEmail.gif]Norma R. Houston Lecturer in Public Law and Government The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Campus Box 3330, Knapp-Sanders Building Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3330 T: 919.843.8930 www.sog.unc.edu<http://www.sog.unc.edu/> E-mails sent to or from this e-mail address that relate to the School of Government's work are public records and may be subject to public access under the North Carolina public records law.
AS
Amanda Stanley
Tue, Apr 21, 2020 7:06 PM

Has anyone looked into CARES II Section 2103? It looks like there is a provision in section 2103 that possibly allows reimbursement for 50% of state unemployment benefits for self-insured plans for municipalities.  Just wondering how different states are handling this.

Thanks,

Amanda L. Stanley
General Counsel
astanley@lkm.orgmailto:astanley@lkm.org
785-354-9565

From: Disasterrelief disasterrelief-bounces@lists.imla.org On Behalf Of Houston, Norma
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 12:34 PM
To: disasterrelief@lists.imla.org
Subject: [Disasterrelief] 2 CFR contract provisions

Listmates:

As you all are no doubt painfully aware, contracts under which costs are incurred for which an applicant seeks FEMA PA reimbursement are subject to 2 CFR Part 200 (Uniform Guidance) procurement requirements.  Among these requirements are that a number of federally-required contract provisions must be included in the contracts.  Even under the current E/E guidance issued by FEMA for the COVID-19 event, the federal contract provision requirement is still in effect.  Have any of your states enacted legislation (or perhaps for those with broad local ordinance authority, an ordinance) incorporating these contracts provisions by reference by operation of law where required and applicable under federal law?

[http://www.sog.unc.edu/dailybulletin/images/SOGLogoForEmail.gif]Norma R. Houston
Lecturer in Public Law and Government
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Campus Box 3330, Knapp-Sanders Building
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3330
T: 919.843.8930
www.sog.unc.eduhttp://www.sog.unc.edu/

E-mails sent to or from this e-mail address that relate to the School of Government's work are public records and may be subject to public access under the North Carolina public records law.

Has anyone looked into CARES II Section 2103? It looks like there is a provision in section 2103 that possibly allows reimbursement for 50% of state unemployment benefits for self-insured plans for municipalities. Just wondering how different states are handling this. Thanks, Amanda L. Stanley General Counsel astanley@lkm.org<mailto:astanley@lkm.org> 785-354-9565 From: Disasterrelief <disasterrelief-bounces@lists.imla.org> On Behalf Of Houston, Norma Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 12:34 PM To: disasterrelief@lists.imla.org Subject: [Disasterrelief] 2 CFR contract provisions Listmates: As you all are no doubt painfully aware, contracts under which costs are incurred for which an applicant seeks FEMA PA reimbursement are subject to 2 CFR Part 200 (Uniform Guidance) procurement requirements. Among these requirements are that a number of federally-required contract provisions must be included in the contracts. Even under the current E/E guidance issued by FEMA for the COVID-19 event, the federal contract provision requirement is still in effect. Have any of your states enacted legislation (or perhaps for those with broad local ordinance authority, an ordinance) incorporating these contracts provisions by reference by operation of law where required and applicable under federal law? [http://www.sog.unc.edu/dailybulletin/images/SOGLogoForEmail.gif]Norma R. Houston Lecturer in Public Law and Government The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Campus Box 3330, Knapp-Sanders Building Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3330 T: 919.843.8930 www.sog.unc.edu<http://www.sog.unc.edu/> E-mails sent to or from this e-mail address that relate to the School of Government's work are public records and may be subject to public access under the North Carolina public records law.
EB
Eileen Blackwood
Tue, Apr 21, 2020 10:41 PM

Yes, our state unemployment folks tell us they are still figuring out how the reimbursement will work logistically, but they have confirmed that self-insured plans will be reimbursed for 50% of the benefits.

Eileen M. Blackwood
City Attorney & Corporation Counsel
City Hall
149 Church St., Suite 11
Burlington, VT  05401
(802) 865-7125
eblackwood@burlingtonvt.govmailto:eblackwood@burlingtonvt.gov

From: Disasterrelief [mailto:disasterrelief-bounces@lists.imla.org] On Behalf Of Amanda Stanley
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 3:07 PM
To: disasterrelief@lists.imla.org
Subject: Re: [Disasterrelief] 2 CFR contract provisions

[WARNING]: External Message

Has anyone looked into CARES II Section 2103? It looks like there is a provision in section 2103 that possibly allows reimbursement for 50% of state unemployment benefits for self-insured plans for municipalities.  Just wondering how different states are handling this.

Thanks,

Amanda L. Stanley
General Counsel
astanley@lkm.orgmailto:astanley@lkm.org
785-354-9565

From: Disasterrelief <disasterrelief-bounces@lists.imla.orgmailto:disasterrelief-bounces@lists.imla.org> On Behalf Of Houston, Norma
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 12:34 PM
To: disasterrelief@lists.imla.orgmailto:disasterrelief@lists.imla.org
Subject: [Disasterrelief] 2 CFR contract provisions

Listmates:

As you all are no doubt painfully aware, contracts under which costs are incurred for which an applicant seeks FEMA PA reimbursement are subject to 2 CFR Part 200 (Uniform Guidance) procurement requirements.  Among these requirements are that a number of federally-required contract provisions must be included in the contracts.  Even under the current E/E guidance issued by FEMA for the COVID-19 event, the federal contract provision requirement is still in effect.  Have any of your states enacted legislation (or perhaps for those with broad local ordinance authority, an ordinance) incorporating these contracts provisions by reference by operation of law where required and applicable under federal law?

[http://www.sog.unc.edu/dailybulletin/images/SOGLogoForEmail.gif]Norma R. Houston
Lecturer in Public Law and Government
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Campus Box 3330, Knapp-Sanders Building
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3330
T: 919.843.8930
www.sog.unc.eduhttp://www.sog.unc.edu/

E-mails sent to or from this e-mail address that relate to the School of Government's work are public records and may be subject to public access under the North Carolina public records law.

Please note that this communication and any response to it will be maintained as a public record and may be subject to disclosure under the Vermont Public Records Act.

Yes, our state unemployment folks tell us they are still figuring out how the reimbursement will work logistically, but they have confirmed that self-insured plans will be reimbursed for 50% of the benefits. Eileen M. Blackwood City Attorney & Corporation Counsel City Hall 149 Church St., Suite 11 Burlington, VT 05401 (802) 865-7125 eblackwood@burlingtonvt.gov<mailto:eblackwood@burlingtonvt.gov> From: Disasterrelief [mailto:disasterrelief-bounces@lists.imla.org] On Behalf Of Amanda Stanley Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 3:07 PM To: disasterrelief@lists.imla.org Subject: Re: [Disasterrelief] 2 CFR contract provisions [WARNING]: External Message Has anyone looked into CARES II Section 2103? It looks like there is a provision in section 2103 that possibly allows reimbursement for 50% of state unemployment benefits for self-insured plans for municipalities. Just wondering how different states are handling this. Thanks, Amanda L. Stanley General Counsel astanley@lkm.org<mailto:astanley@lkm.org> 785-354-9565 From: Disasterrelief <disasterrelief-bounces@lists.imla.org<mailto:disasterrelief-bounces@lists.imla.org>> On Behalf Of Houston, Norma Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 12:34 PM To: disasterrelief@lists.imla.org<mailto:disasterrelief@lists.imla.org> Subject: [Disasterrelief] 2 CFR contract provisions Listmates: As you all are no doubt painfully aware, contracts under which costs are incurred for which an applicant seeks FEMA PA reimbursement are subject to 2 CFR Part 200 (Uniform Guidance) procurement requirements. Among these requirements are that a number of federally-required contract provisions must be included in the contracts. Even under the current E/E guidance issued by FEMA for the COVID-19 event, the federal contract provision requirement is still in effect. Have any of your states enacted legislation (or perhaps for those with broad local ordinance authority, an ordinance) incorporating these contracts provisions by reference by operation of law where required and applicable under federal law? [http://www.sog.unc.edu/dailybulletin/images/SOGLogoForEmail.gif]Norma R. Houston Lecturer in Public Law and Government The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Campus Box 3330, Knapp-Sanders Building Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3330 T: 919.843.8930 www.sog.unc.edu<http://www.sog.unc.edu/> E-mails sent to or from this e-mail address that relate to the School of Government's work are public records and may be subject to public access under the North Carolina public records law. Please note that this communication and any response to it will be maintained as a public record and may be subject to disclosure under the Vermont Public Records Act.
CM
Corrie Manning
Mon, Apr 27, 2020 6:33 PM

If anyone has examples of how this is working logistically in their state, I would be curious to hear.

It is my understanding this is not limited to cities over 500,000, but it anyone has a different understanding I would be curious to hear that as well.

Thanks,

Corrie Manning
General Counsel
League of California Cities
p. 916.658.8267
cmanning@cacities.orgmailto:cmanning@cacities.org | www.cacities.org
[cid:image002.png@01D4A73F.6528ADD0]

Strengthening California Cities
Through Education & Advocacy
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/CaCities │ Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/leagueofcacities │ YouTubehttps://www.youtube.com/user/leagueofcacities │ LinkedInhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/league-of-california-cities/

Disclaimer: This communication may contain the League of California Cities' confidential and proprietary data. This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipients named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. In addition, if you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message.

The League of California Cities does not provide legal advice and nothing in this email should be construed as legal advice.  Please contact your legal counsel if you have a legal question regarding any information in this email.

From: Disasterrelief [mailto:disasterrelief-bounces@lists.imla.org] On Behalf Of Eileen Blackwood
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 3:41 PM
To: Amanda Stanley astanley@lkm.org; disasterrelief@lists.imla.org
Subject: Re: [Disasterrelief] 2 CFR contract provisions

Yes, our state unemployment folks tell us they are still figuring out how the reimbursement will work logistically, but they have confirmed that self-insured plans will be reimbursed for 50% of the benefits.

Eileen M. Blackwood
City Attorney & Corporation Counsel
City Hall
149 Church St., Suite 11
Burlington, VT  05401
(802) 865-7125
eblackwood@burlingtonvt.govmailto:eblackwood@burlingtonvt.gov

From: Disasterrelief [mailto:disasterrelief-bounces@lists.imla.org] On Behalf Of Amanda Stanley
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 3:07 PM
To: disasterrelief@lists.imla.orgmailto:disasterrelief@lists.imla.org
Subject: Re: [Disasterrelief] 2 CFR contract provisions

[WARNING]: External Message

Has anyone looked into CARES II Section 2103? It looks like there is a provision in section 2103 that possibly allows reimbursement for 50% of state unemployment benefits for self-insured plans for municipalities.  Just wondering how different states are handling this.

Thanks,

Amanda L. Stanley
General Counsel
astanley@lkm.orgmailto:astanley@lkm.org
785-354-9565

From: Disasterrelief <disasterrelief-bounces@lists.imla.orgmailto:disasterrelief-bounces@lists.imla.org> On Behalf Of Houston, Norma
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 12:34 PM
To: disasterrelief@lists.imla.orgmailto:disasterrelief@lists.imla.org
Subject: [Disasterrelief] 2 CFR contract provisions

Listmates:

As you all are no doubt painfully aware, contracts under which costs are incurred for which an applicant seeks FEMA PA reimbursement are subject to 2 CFR Part 200 (Uniform Guidance) procurement requirements.  Among these requirements are that a number of federally-required contract provisions must be included in the contracts.  Even under the current E/E guidance issued by FEMA for the COVID-19 event, the federal contract provision requirement is still in effect.  Have any of your states enacted legislation (or perhaps for those with broad local ordinance authority, an ordinance) incorporating these contracts provisions by reference by operation of law where required and applicable under federal law?

[http://www.sog.unc.edu/dailybulletin/images/SOGLogoForEmail.gif]Norma R. Houston
Lecturer in Public Law and Government
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Campus Box 3330, Knapp-Sanders Building
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3330
T: 919.843.8930
www.sog.unc.eduhttp://www.sog.unc.edu/

E-mails sent to or from this e-mail address that relate to the School of Government's work are public records and may be subject to public access under the North Carolina public records law.

Please note that this communication and any response to it will be maintained as a public record and may be subject to disclosure under the Vermont Public Records Act.
CAUTION: This email originated from outside our organization. Exercise caution when replying, opening attachments or clicking links.

If anyone has examples of how this is working logistically in their state, I would be curious to hear. It is my understanding this is not limited to cities over 500,000, but it anyone has a different understanding I would be curious to hear that as well. Thanks, Corrie Manning General Counsel League of California Cities p. 916.658.8267 cmanning@cacities.org<mailto:cmanning@cacities.org> | www.cacities.org [cid:image002.png@01D4A73F.6528ADD0] Strengthening California Cities Through Education & Advocacy Twitter<https://twitter.com/CaCities> │ Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/leagueofcacities> │ YouTube<https://www.youtube.com/user/leagueofcacities> │ LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/league-of-california-cities/> Disclaimer: This communication may contain the League of California Cities' confidential and proprietary data. This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipients named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. In addition, if you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message. The League of California Cities does not provide legal advice and nothing in this email should be construed as legal advice. Please contact your legal counsel if you have a legal question regarding any information in this email. From: Disasterrelief [mailto:disasterrelief-bounces@lists.imla.org] On Behalf Of Eileen Blackwood Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 3:41 PM To: Amanda Stanley <astanley@lkm.org>; disasterrelief@lists.imla.org Subject: Re: [Disasterrelief] 2 CFR contract provisions Yes, our state unemployment folks tell us they are still figuring out how the reimbursement will work logistically, but they have confirmed that self-insured plans will be reimbursed for 50% of the benefits. Eileen M. Blackwood City Attorney & Corporation Counsel City Hall 149 Church St., Suite 11 Burlington, VT 05401 (802) 865-7125 eblackwood@burlingtonvt.gov<mailto:eblackwood@burlingtonvt.gov> From: Disasterrelief [mailto:disasterrelief-bounces@lists.imla.org] On Behalf Of Amanda Stanley Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 3:07 PM To: disasterrelief@lists.imla.org<mailto:disasterrelief@lists.imla.org> Subject: Re: [Disasterrelief] 2 CFR contract provisions [WARNING]: External Message Has anyone looked into CARES II Section 2103? It looks like there is a provision in section 2103 that possibly allows reimbursement for 50% of state unemployment benefits for self-insured plans for municipalities. Just wondering how different states are handling this. Thanks, Amanda L. Stanley General Counsel astanley@lkm.org<mailto:astanley@lkm.org> 785-354-9565 From: Disasterrelief <disasterrelief-bounces@lists.imla.org<mailto:disasterrelief-bounces@lists.imla.org>> On Behalf Of Houston, Norma Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 12:34 PM To: disasterrelief@lists.imla.org<mailto:disasterrelief@lists.imla.org> Subject: [Disasterrelief] 2 CFR contract provisions Listmates: As you all are no doubt painfully aware, contracts under which costs are incurred for which an applicant seeks FEMA PA reimbursement are subject to 2 CFR Part 200 (Uniform Guidance) procurement requirements. Among these requirements are that a number of federally-required contract provisions must be included in the contracts. Even under the current E/E guidance issued by FEMA for the COVID-19 event, the federal contract provision requirement is still in effect. Have any of your states enacted legislation (or perhaps for those with broad local ordinance authority, an ordinance) incorporating these contracts provisions by reference by operation of law where required and applicable under federal law? [http://www.sog.unc.edu/dailybulletin/images/SOGLogoForEmail.gif]Norma R. Houston Lecturer in Public Law and Government The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Campus Box 3330, Knapp-Sanders Building Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3330 T: 919.843.8930 www.sog.unc.edu<http://www.sog.unc.edu/> E-mails sent to or from this e-mail address that relate to the School of Government's work are public records and may be subject to public access under the North Carolina public records law. Please note that this communication and any response to it will be maintained as a public record and may be subject to disclosure under the Vermont Public Records Act. CAUTION: This email originated from outside our organization. Exercise caution when replying, opening attachments or clicking links.
AS
Amanda Stanley
Mon, Apr 27, 2020 7:14 PM

I was informed by our Department of Labor that it will be automatically be taken off the quarterly reimbursement bill.  The reimbursing municipalities will get a bill for only 50% of the cost.  The bill will show what the total cost was, the subtraction due to the CARES Act, and then the new total.  It is applicable to all reimbursing municipalities regardless of size through December 31, 2020.

Amanda L. Stanley
General Counsel
astanley@lkm.orgmailto:astanley@lkm.org
785-354-9565

From: Corrie Manning cmanning@cacities.org
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2020 1:34 PM
To: Eileen Blackwood eblackwood@burlingtonvt.gov; Amanda Stanley astanley@lkm.org; disasterrelief@lists.imla.org
Subject: RE: 2 CFR contract provisions

If anyone has examples of how this is working logistically in their state, I would be curious to hear.

It is my understanding this is not limited to cities over 500,000, but it anyone has a different understanding I would be curious to hear that as well.

Thanks,

Corrie Manning
General Counsel
League of California Cities
p. 916.658.8267
cmanning@cacities.orgmailto:cmanning@cacities.org | www.cacities.org
[cid:image002.png@01D4A73F.6528ADD0]

Strengthening California Cities
Through Education & Advocacy
Twitterhttps://twitter.com/CaCities │ Facebookhttps://www.facebook.com/leagueofcacities │ YouTubehttps://www.youtube.com/user/leagueofcacities │ LinkedInhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/league-of-california-cities/

Disclaimer: This communication may contain the League of California Cities' confidential and proprietary data. This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipients named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. In addition, if you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message.

The League of California Cities does not provide legal advice and nothing in this email should be construed as legal advice.  Please contact your legal counsel if you have a legal question regarding any information in this email.

From: Disasterrelief [mailto:disasterrelief-bounces@lists.imla.org] On Behalf Of Eileen Blackwood
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 3:41 PM
To: Amanda Stanley <astanley@lkm.orgmailto:astanley@lkm.org>; disasterrelief@lists.imla.orgmailto:disasterrelief@lists.imla.org
Subject: Re: [Disasterrelief] 2 CFR contract provisions

Yes, our state unemployment folks tell us they are still figuring out how the reimbursement will work logistically, but they have confirmed that self-insured plans will be reimbursed for 50% of the benefits.

Eileen M. Blackwood
City Attorney & Corporation Counsel
City Hall
149 Church St., Suite 11
Burlington, VT  05401
(802) 865-7125
eblackwood@burlingtonvt.govmailto:eblackwood@burlingtonvt.gov

From: Disasterrelief [mailto:disasterrelief-bounces@lists.imla.org] On Behalf Of Amanda Stanley
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 3:07 PM
To: disasterrelief@lists.imla.orgmailto:disasterrelief@lists.imla.org
Subject: Re: [Disasterrelief] 2 CFR contract provisions

[WARNING]: External Message

Has anyone looked into CARES II Section 2103? It looks like there is a provision in section 2103 that possibly allows reimbursement for 50% of state unemployment benefits for self-insured plans for municipalities.  Just wondering how different states are handling this.

Thanks,

Amanda L. Stanley
General Counsel
astanley@lkm.orgmailto:astanley@lkm.org
785-354-9565

From: Disasterrelief <disasterrelief-bounces@lists.imla.orgmailto:disasterrelief-bounces@lists.imla.org> On Behalf Of Houston, Norma
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 12:34 PM
To: disasterrelief@lists.imla.orgmailto:disasterrelief@lists.imla.org
Subject: [Disasterrelief] 2 CFR contract provisions

Listmates:

As you all are no doubt painfully aware, contracts under which costs are incurred for which an applicant seeks FEMA PA reimbursement are subject to 2 CFR Part 200 (Uniform Guidance) procurement requirements.  Among these requirements are that a number of federally-required contract provisions must be included in the contracts.  Even under the current E/E guidance issued by FEMA for the COVID-19 event, the federal contract provision requirement is still in effect.  Have any of your states enacted legislation (or perhaps for those with broad local ordinance authority, an ordinance) incorporating these contracts provisions by reference by operation of law where required and applicable under federal law?

[http://www.sog.unc.edu/dailybulletin/images/SOGLogoForEmail.gif]Norma R. Houston
Lecturer in Public Law and Government
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Campus Box 3330, Knapp-Sanders Building
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3330
T: 919.843.8930
www.sog.unc.eduhttp://www.sog.unc.edu/

E-mails sent to or from this e-mail address that relate to the School of Government's work are public records and may be subject to public access under the North Carolina public records law.

Please note that this communication and any response to it will be maintained as a public record and may be subject to disclosure under the Vermont Public Records Act.
CAUTION: This email originated from outside our organization. Exercise caution when replying, opening attachments or clicking links.

I was informed by our Department of Labor that it will be automatically be taken off the quarterly reimbursement bill. The reimbursing municipalities will get a bill for only 50% of the cost. The bill will show what the total cost was, the subtraction due to the CARES Act, and then the new total. It is applicable to all reimbursing municipalities regardless of size through December 31, 2020. Amanda L. Stanley General Counsel astanley@lkm.org<mailto:astanley@lkm.org> 785-354-9565 From: Corrie Manning <cmanning@cacities.org> Sent: Monday, April 27, 2020 1:34 PM To: Eileen Blackwood <eblackwood@burlingtonvt.gov>; Amanda Stanley <astanley@lkm.org>; disasterrelief@lists.imla.org Subject: RE: 2 CFR contract provisions If anyone has examples of how this is working logistically in their state, I would be curious to hear. It is my understanding this is not limited to cities over 500,000, but it anyone has a different understanding I would be curious to hear that as well. Thanks, Corrie Manning General Counsel League of California Cities p. 916.658.8267 cmanning@cacities.org<mailto:cmanning@cacities.org> | www.cacities.org [cid:image002.png@01D4A73F.6528ADD0] Strengthening California Cities Through Education & Advocacy Twitter<https://twitter.com/CaCities> │ Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/leagueofcacities> │ YouTube<https://www.youtube.com/user/leagueofcacities> │ LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/company/league-of-california-cities/> Disclaimer: This communication may contain the League of California Cities' confidential and proprietary data. This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipients named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. In addition, if you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message. The League of California Cities does not provide legal advice and nothing in this email should be construed as legal advice. Please contact your legal counsel if you have a legal question regarding any information in this email. From: Disasterrelief [mailto:disasterrelief-bounces@lists.imla.org] On Behalf Of Eileen Blackwood Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 3:41 PM To: Amanda Stanley <astanley@lkm.org<mailto:astanley@lkm.org>>; disasterrelief@lists.imla.org<mailto:disasterrelief@lists.imla.org> Subject: Re: [Disasterrelief] 2 CFR contract provisions Yes, our state unemployment folks tell us they are still figuring out how the reimbursement will work logistically, but they have confirmed that self-insured plans will be reimbursed for 50% of the benefits. Eileen M. Blackwood City Attorney & Corporation Counsel City Hall 149 Church St., Suite 11 Burlington, VT 05401 (802) 865-7125 eblackwood@burlingtonvt.gov<mailto:eblackwood@burlingtonvt.gov> From: Disasterrelief [mailto:disasterrelief-bounces@lists.imla.org] On Behalf Of Amanda Stanley Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 3:07 PM To: disasterrelief@lists.imla.org<mailto:disasterrelief@lists.imla.org> Subject: Re: [Disasterrelief] 2 CFR contract provisions [WARNING]: External Message Has anyone looked into CARES II Section 2103? It looks like there is a provision in section 2103 that possibly allows reimbursement for 50% of state unemployment benefits for self-insured plans for municipalities. Just wondering how different states are handling this. Thanks, Amanda L. Stanley General Counsel astanley@lkm.org<mailto:astanley@lkm.org> 785-354-9565 From: Disasterrelief <disasterrelief-bounces@lists.imla.org<mailto:disasterrelief-bounces@lists.imla.org>> On Behalf Of Houston, Norma Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 12:34 PM To: disasterrelief@lists.imla.org<mailto:disasterrelief@lists.imla.org> Subject: [Disasterrelief] 2 CFR contract provisions Listmates: As you all are no doubt painfully aware, contracts under which costs are incurred for which an applicant seeks FEMA PA reimbursement are subject to 2 CFR Part 200 (Uniform Guidance) procurement requirements. Among these requirements are that a number of federally-required contract provisions must be included in the contracts. Even under the current E/E guidance issued by FEMA for the COVID-19 event, the federal contract provision requirement is still in effect. Have any of your states enacted legislation (or perhaps for those with broad local ordinance authority, an ordinance) incorporating these contracts provisions by reference by operation of law where required and applicable under federal law? [http://www.sog.unc.edu/dailybulletin/images/SOGLogoForEmail.gif]Norma R. Houston Lecturer in Public Law and Government The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Campus Box 3330, Knapp-Sanders Building Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3330 T: 919.843.8930 www.sog.unc.edu<http://www.sog.unc.edu/> E-mails sent to or from this e-mail address that relate to the School of Government's work are public records and may be subject to public access under the North Carolina public records law. Please note that this communication and any response to it will be maintained as a public record and may be subject to disclosure under the Vermont Public Records Act. CAUTION: This email originated from outside our organization. Exercise caution when replying, opening attachments or clicking links.