9th Circuit - Second Amendment - Covid Emergency Orders - tiered scrutiny
Ventura County passed orders to deal with Covid by closing Gun shops, firing ranges and ammunition shops for a 48 day period. The lower court found the orders valid under Jacobson vs Massachusetts but the panel of the 9th Circuit found that the Orders imposed upon a core constitutional right; i.e., the 2nd Amendment right to bear arms. The court evaluated the order under strict scrutiny finding it failed that test and under intermediate scrutiny finding it failed that as well. The gist of those findings was that the County's Health Officer had not identified why these businesses in particular caused increased risks of Covid over the 19 businesses deemed essential that were allowed to remain open. The court specifically declined to hold that the Orders categorically violated the 2nd Amendment but only that on the facts supporting the Orders, they did not overcome the scrutiny required.
McDougal vs. County of Ventura https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2022/01/20/20-56220.pdf
Supreme Court - Confrontation Clause - The Open Door is not open
On a claim that the Defendant in a criminal case had "opened the door" the state introduced evidence of a statement a co-defendant had made as part of his guilty plea. The co-defendant did not testify against the Defendant and as a result introduction of the out of court statement violated the Defendant's 6th Amendment right.
Hemphill v. New York
Charles W. Thompson, Jr.
Of Counsel
P: (202) 466-5424 x7110
M: (240) 876-6790
D: (202) 742-1016
[facebook icon]https://www.facebook.com/InternationalMunicipalLawyersAssociation/[twitter icon]https://twitter.com/imlalegal[linkedin icon]https://www.linkedin.com/company/international-municipal-lawyers-association-inc./
[logo]https://imla.org/
51 Monroe St. Suite 404
Rockville, MD, 20850
www.imla.orghttp://www.imla.org/
Plan Ahead!
IMLA's 2022 Mid-Year Seminarhttps://imla.org/seminars/, April 8-11, 2022 in Washington, D.C.!
IMLA's 2022 Annualhttps://imla.org/annual-conference/ Conference, October 19-23, 2022 in Portland, OR!
Check out our On-Demand webinar libraryhttps://netforum.avectra.com/eweb/shopping/shopping.aspx?site=imla&webcode=shopping&cart=0&shopsearchCat=Merchandise&productCat=Webinar with 100+ webinars at your fingertips.
That pesky Constitution
Get Outlook for Androidhttps://aka.ms/ghei36
From: Chuck Thompson cthompson@imla.org
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 5:47:11 PM
To: disasterrelief@lists.imla.org disasterrelief@lists.imla.org; cityattorneys@lists.imla.org cityattorneys@lists.imla.org; counties@lists.imla.org counties@lists.imla.org; 'policeadvisors@lists.imla.org' (policeadvisors@lists.imla.org) policeadvisors@lists.imla.org
Subject: [Disasterrelief] News of The Day - They're back - 9th Circuit acts to find emergency Covid Orders violate the 2nd Amendment
9th Circuit – Second Amendment – Covid Emergency Orders – tiered scrutiny
Ventura County passed orders to deal with Covid by closing Gun shops, firing ranges and ammunition shops for a 48 day period. The lower court found the orders valid under Jacobson vs Massachusetts but the panel of the 9th Circuit found that the Orders imposed upon a core constitutional right; i.e., the 2nd Amendment right to bear arms. The court evaluated the order under strict scrutiny finding it failed that test and under intermediate scrutiny finding it failed that as well. The gist of those findings was that the County’s Health Officer had not identified why these businesses in particular caused increased risks of Covid over the 19 businesses deemed essential that were allowed to remain open. The court specifically declined to hold that the Orders categorically violated the 2nd Amendment but only that on the facts supporting the Orders, they did not overcome the scrutiny required.
McDougal vs. County of Ventura https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2022/01/20/20-56220.pdf
Supreme Court – Confrontation Clause – The Open Door is not open
On a claim that the Defendant in a criminal case had “opened the door” the state introduced evidence of a statement a co-defendant had made as part of his guilty plea. The co-defendant did not testify against the Defendant and as a result introduction of the out of court statement violated the Defendant’s 6th Amendment right.
Hemphill v. New York
Charles W. Thompson, Jr.
Of Counsel
P: (202) 466-5424 x7110
M: (240) 876-6790
D: (202) 742-1016
[facebook icon]https://www.facebook.com/InternationalMunicipalLawyersAssociation/[twitter icon]https://twitter.com/imlalegal[linkedin icon]https://www.linkedin.com/company/international-municipal-lawyers-association-inc./
[logo]https://imla.org/
51 Monroe St. Suite 404
Rockville, MD, 20850
www.imla.orghttp://www.imla.org/
Plan Ahead!
IMLA’s 2022 Mid-Year Seminarhttps://imla.org/seminars/, April 8-11, 2022 in Washington, D.C.!
IMLA’s 2022 Annualhttps://imla.org/annual-conference/ Conference, October 19-23, 2022 in Portland, OR!
Check out our On-Demand webinar libraryhttps://netforum.avectra.com/eweb/shopping/shopping.aspx?site=imla&webcode=shopping&cart=0&shopsearchCat=Merchandise&productCat=Webinar with 100+ webinars at your fingertips.